The objective of this study was to understand how financial institutions evaluate and choose market data feed providers. We examined decision-making dynamics, usage intensity across roles, vendor preferences and the factors influencing renewal and switching. The goal was to clarify who drives decisions and what sustains long-term vendor loyalty.
Market data feeds are deeply embedded in financial workflows, but vendor selection and renewal decisions are rarely straightforward. Influence is distributed across technical, commercial and user stakeholders, making it difficult to pinpoint what truly drives preference and retention.
Key challenges included:
We treated vendor selection as a behavioural ecosystem, not a feature comparison exercise.
Here’s how we did it:
The study clarified who influences vendor decisions and how usage intensity shapes renewals. It showed where loyalty came from workflow dependency versus switching friction and where dissatisfaction built quietly despite surface satisfaction. The insights helped refine positioning, strengthen retention strategy and align product priorities with decision-makers and power users, beyond pricing-only churn assumptions.
Prizm Data helped us understand how vendor decisions are actually made inside institutions. The study clarified where loyalty is built, where risk emerges and how we should prioritise our positioning and retention efforts.